DeVerm;353063 Wrote: 
> huh? Did you use full response 2-100kHz audio kit from media to
> speakers? Did you verify that the phase response through-out the
> spectrum was within reasonable margins etc? Did you use the same
> "master" for both versions? Are you sure the SACD disc was okay. Didn't
> it have a hybrid red book track that you could have used for the CD
> player, or even play that in the SACD player too? Isn't it so that by
> far everyone agrees that most SACD's sound better than the CD-versions
> because they used better mastering instead of compressing the CD master
> to death? Okay, you win, it's red book "uber alles"! You know I'm just
> having some fun here but I really think your test has some flaws and
> can't be used as an example that all tests are flawed.
> 

What are you talking about?
DeVerm;352679 Wrote: 
> But my question to you is: how can you stay a die-hard red book fan
> when, at the same time, you hear (as opposed to just knowing) that
> there's something better available?
I was answering your question above that's all. My answer was that I
don't hear there's something better, and although many others do most
of them are probably like me and have not listened in a controlled way,
so it doesn't mean anything. I didn't imply anything else so calm down
(that goes for you too Themis)! :)

DeVerm;353063 Wrote: 
> 
> So you read that "extreme" part wrong as it describes the harmonic
> signature of the instruments, not their deviation from many other
> acoustic instruments...
> 
In your opinion. I read "We used the gamelan music of Bali, which is
extremely rich in HFCs with a nonstationary structure" to mean the
'music' is 'extremely' rich in HFCs with a nonstationary
structure...because that is what the sentence says. I think it's
possible they gave more away than they intended in that sentence, but I
don't agree they meant something different to what they said.

DeVerm;353063 Wrote: 
> But I do believe that when you listen to a live performance of a
> classical piece, you will hear lots of HFCs so they could have recorded
> that too. If you only believe the results when do use that, someone else
> will come up saying he will only believe it when they use the Gipsy
> Kings and another one wants to have Iggi Pop checked out.
> 
That feels really unfair. I never said use the Gypsy Kings or Iggy Pop.
In fact, it was me who suggested classical a few posts back!
Darren


-- 
darrenyeats

SB3 / Inguz -> Krell KAV-300i (pre bypass) -> PMC AB-1
Dell laptop -> JVC UX-C30 mini system
------------------------------------------------------------------------
darrenyeats's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10799
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=54077

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to