pfarrell;516491 Wrote: > michael123 wrote: > > Human hearing is adaptive. You do not hear 144db 'at once', but you > can > > hear the micro-details while you adapt to the listening level. > > Again, BS > > > > Anyway, I trust my ears. If you do not hear the different between 24 > > bit recordings and 16bit, then.. > > I did not say that. What I said was that 24 bits is overkill, no one > can > detect it. No one can record it. > > Well done RedBook can be amazing, but its rarely done due to Loudness > Wars. Commercial 24 bit aim at audiophiles, so they don't compress the > hell out of it. But its not the word length that make it sound better. > > > > Weiss is definitely better than Transporter. The problem is that > > hooking up via SPDIF is not a good idea as it will introduce jitter > :-( > > Weiss works the best via IEEE 1394, as Transporter prefers Ethernet > > This may be true, but I was commenting on your other paragraphs, which > were pure hype. > > -- > Pat Farrell > http://www.pfarrell.com/
Is there a simple method to analyze the dynamic range required to reproduce perfectly specific FLAC file? -- michael123 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=75180 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
