michael123;577259 Wrote: > sure, the DAC in test was Transporter, and I think Sean himself wrote > somewhere on this forum that Transporter is not forgiving.. > > But still..
The measurements that Slim published for Transporter's DAC were taken with TP acting as master clock from a slaved s/pdif instrument. Stereophile IIRC used s/pdif but no word clock - it would have scored a little higher if they had, but only by a hair on these tests, which aren't really looking for jitter. They did not do a proper test of DAC jitter susceptibility - the tool they used for data correlated jitter in a machester receiver was incorrectly applied to ethernet streaming. Obviously for Touch there is no s/pdif input so they would have been playing files over the network, which uses its local (only) clock. -- seanadams ------------------------------------------------------------------------ seanadams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=82050 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
