Caad;643977 Wrote: 
> 
> This inspired me not to use FLAC at all. 
> In the matter of fact. Why do Audiophiles use FLAC or other compressed
> standards? 
> The only reason is to save space on the Harddisk.  As I see it,  it
> must only have been a problem a couple years ago when the hard disks
> had less memory. Todays hard disks have a lot of memory and I don't see
> why not using uncompressed standards as WAW instead?
> CAAD
I don't know if this is a language issue, but what's a WAW?  WAV I
know, but WAW?

Assuming WAW=WAV, the main reason for not using only WAVs for me is
that the tagging for WAVs is problematic to say the least.  FLACs can
be tagged with many different tools, and the tags can be extended to
include one's own variations, which you can use in Squeezebox, Foobar
or other such tools.

Having said this, that's no reason not to transcode FLAC to PCM/WAV for
transmission to the Touch, and I do so.


-- 
PasTim
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PasTim's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=41642
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84742

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to