rgro;680558 Wrote: > Had a bit of time this evening and went all the way back to the original > TT 3.0 settings and had a good listen. At least with my equipment and > ears, there's a fair difference between those original TT 3.0 settings > and SBGK's numbers. > > While the original TT 3.0 sound is, by comparison, what I would call > polite, the sound with SBGK's values is downright exciting and, at > least to my tastes, noticeably more realistic, detailed and, > especially, it gets this startlingly bigger, wider,and deeper > imaging/soundstage out of my speakers. All this without any roughness > on the extreme highs (solo violins and sopranos!) and the decay on > things like cymbals, triangle, tympani, etc. keeps going all the way to > nothingness. > > I listened to Judy Collins' rendition of "Amazing Grace" and the > feeling that I was sitting right in St. Paul's chapel with her and the > choir was just uncanny...something I'd not experienced heretofore. > And, of course, there is the delight at discovering those little > details you've not heard before. > > As always, YMMV, but I'm definitely sticking to the SBGK numbers > until/if something better comes along.
I agree with you, but cannot attribute it only to SBGK's mods, l because I've applied them at the same time I've applied my Shunyata power cable and the Shakti stones. The difference in musicality is staggering. I guess it's time to switch back to vanilla TT3.0, everything else staying the same. Then I'll know for sure. -- magiccarpetride ------------------------------------------------------------------------ magiccarpetride's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37863 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
