praganj;692068 Wrote: > Today evening i spent hours testing different priorities schemes - > default TT 3.0, default Logitech, early SBGK and "late" SBGK. > > I created few "tt" files so the switch between different configuration > was as fast as possible. > > I was not touching and changing all parameters one by one. > > For my taste and my system default TT 3.0 with buffer=3200 delivers the > best performance. SBGK and default Logitech produce softer sound, but to > dark and sleepy. > > I will say, that with default TT 3.0 the sound is little sharper, but > there is more impact, rhytm and dynamics (PRAT ?) > > So - if you prefer more softer warmer sound, or your system is to > bright, than go for SBGK or Logitech priorities, if you prefer more > grip, impact, PRAT than go for default TT 3.0 with small buffer. > > This is my own experience based on my (subjective ?) tests. > > Who knows, maybe in another system with another DAC ( i am using > Buffalo II and Teddy PS for SBT) the results will be different ... :)
LOL! So you're saying that changing buffer length is effectively the same as applying EQ (change bass or HF)? It's like saying that you have more money once you exchange one paper bill into same amount of money but in coins. :) Buffers are used to ensure continuity of data stream not for DSP. So your statement demonstrates your lack of knowledge about how digital audio works and that causes your delusional thinking. -- Bytec ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bytec's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17676 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93649 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
