ralphpnj wrote: 
> Why stop at only 8 points? How about 8K points? Of course with 8K
> (8,000) points one would need a sampling rate of 192,000khz for a 24khz
> frequency but man would it sound smooth!
> 
> All kidding aside, please post any links which show conclusive proof of
> why an 8X sampling rate is required and not the 2X sampling rate which
> is presently being used, otherwise we can all just make things up to
> suit our needs, as I did above.

+1

That guy is clearly wrong he do not understand Nyquist :) in fact all
the reasoning you cited (cant find that post ) is clearly the usual
spiel from someone who actually don't understand the sample theorem and
is influnced by audiophile beliefs .

They usually miss that the signal is reconstructed by the fillter and
that it is bandwidth limited ,they usually don't get that sampling can
catch everything about a signal 1/2 the Nyquist frequency including the
temporal information yes the time domain is intact there is no loss of
timing accuracy.
The usual audiophile myths is that time resolving is limited to 1/44.1
for CD this is not true ,just look at the reconstructed analogue signal
it looks continues to me and will be identical to to the original
-bandwidth limited- signal .

So yet again you can only benfit from higher fs in the source material
if can hear above 22.05 kHZ (if no gremlins are involved ) and a
bandwith limit is functionally the same regardless if it is done
digitally or by analogue means .

Don't confuse with practical solutions there are all kinds of good
reason to have dacs and adc oversampling to very high rates and dito to
actually record stuff in 24/192 in the studio but consumer playback is
another thing .


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69882

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to