bhaagensen wrote: > Maybe, but you can't argue that by referring to (only) Nyquist - the > main point of my first post.
I think you can. Remember Nyquist (or, more formally, the "Nyquist–Shannon sampling theorem") states that "If a function x(t) contains no frequencies higher than B hertz, it is completely determined by giving its ordinates at a series of points spaced 1/(2B) seconds apart." "Completely determined" means "completely reconstructible", but I might be missing your point. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69882
_______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
