ralphpnj wrote: > > > The is no such thing as soundstage. The only thing soundstage is a > construct of the over active imaginations of audio reviewers. Therefore > it can not be wider, taller or deeper. > > Images and imaging are another audio reviewer construct. Doesn't really > exist, never has and never will. >
Call it what you want, but the way the "physical dimension" of sound is percieved is a property of the presentation. This is theorised in the field of psychoaccoustics. So not nitpicking the wording, the point is not hard to see. ralphpnj wrote: > > > Highs are not sweet, unless you're in a Dutch coffee shop. > Again the softness/hardness of sound is qualified in psychoaccoustics. ralphpnj wrote: > > I never suffer from listening fatigue when listening to my current audio > system, which includes a Transporter. I only suffer from listening to > bad music. > That sound can create a sensation of fatigue is also well known. Though I agree its often misused among audiophiles. Cut through the bull and open your mind. Psychoaccoustics is very interesting qualifying the stuff that "your incompetent" audiophile throws around- though obviously not an exact science. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ bhaagensen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7418 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
