SBGK wrote: > ok, so you won't answer the question and use misdirection. Here is a > quote from an eminently respected member of the community in reference > to TT3.0 > > "I did some testing on this a few months ago and found that with some > DACs parts of TT3.0 made a significant improvement and other parts made > no difference, and some parts made it not work at all, in particular > some USB DACs don't work with the small buffer sizes TT3.0 uses by > default. > > Other DACs didn't seem to be affected much at all by TT3.0. > > I tried a couple DACs that have both S/PDIF and USB input and found that > different TT3.0 settings give the best results for different inputs. > > So as with just about everything else in digital audio, try it yourself > and see what you like the best! > > John S. " > > You guys are the ultimate navel gazers, unbelievable. You can't see how > wrong you are and yet support each other with your diatribes. very > mature.
Not sure , how many people here know John Swenson. In my case, killing of all the daemon processes (tt -k) , made the sound a bit softer. (you are mean .. calling people 'navel gazers' ha ha :-) ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SoftwireEngineer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7000 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
