callesoroe wrote: > Sounds great. I have no reason to believe it is not. The bas response is > a lot better on my 24/96 files. This one too. And my Tact indicates it > is 24/96.
Well, yes, the Tact would indicate that, but it only looks at the file format, not the actual sound contents of the file. The reason to believe it is not is that there have been so many examples of "standard-resolution" material upsampled (and zero-padded from 16 bits to 24 bits) that I have started checking every one. Not every 96/24 or 192/24 file is hi-res - a lot of it is standard resolution CD material with lots of empty space added afterwards. But the important thing is that it sounds good to you. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98393 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
