Julf wrote: > Well, yes, the Tact would indicate that, but it only looks at the file > format, not the actual sound contents of the file. The reason to believe > it is not is that there have been so many examples of > "standard-resolution" material upsampled (and zero-padded from 16 bits > to 24 bits) that I have started checking every one. Not every 96/24 or > 192/24 file is hi-res - a lot of it is standard resolution CD material > with lots of empty space added afterwards. But the important thing is > that it sounds good to you.
Why would hi-rez have better bass response? Surely this is a mastering thing? Darren ------------------------------------------------------------------------ darrenyeats's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10799 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98393 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
