Archimago wrote: > Thanks for the confirmation on this. > > That's really quite ridiculous! Deservedly a -shame -for the AES for > publishing this if indeed there was some kind of scholarly peer-review > process applied and missed such an obvious omission. > > Maybe they should print / publish a followup where the authors are asked > to submit details of the filters, or a retraction if these basics of the > experiment set-up cannot be provided?!
More information here: Google: "AES Convention Papers Forum" and a few keywords from the paper title. I'd post the link if I could but I am currently prohibited from doing so by the forum software. Which is the AES papers forum for the paper that we are discussing (readible by anybody, postable by AES members) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103537 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
