jkeny wrote: > You've got to laugh, really > > Arny tries to paint products that contravene USB 2.0 electrical > specification as "a few trivial problems with non-mainstream gear" and > tries to exaggerate my original statement into "A missing diode does not > equate to instant bench fire and serious damage." > > Yet, on the other hand he tries to demean a well designed USB $175 > device that many report has improved their audio into "product does > anything but take in money from naive placebophiles, add some more > potential points of failure and convert energy into heat." > > It's all very amusing. Keep going, Arny, the entertainment value alone > is worth it
I think that the cart is well in advance of the cart. Where is the independent certification of the device we're discussing as being fully USB standards-compliant? How do we know that it is any better than your average USB hub? As I understand things, we have zero empirical evidence related to that question, or any other question relating to its operation. Got any? BTW jkeny, "Trust me" is not empirical evidence of USB standards compliance in most circles. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
