arnyk wrote: > Well you are way ahead of me, could you provide a link to that > statement? > > > > Please describe the reliable means that you have used to observe SQ. > > > > Well that's not me. You may have read that I feel that you are free to > determine SQ by any means and share it, but of course I will use logic > and reason and experience to evaluate it. > > Are you against the use of logic and reason and experience? > > There are plenty of placebophiles on the web who claim to have heard any > difference no matter how improbable, no matter how flawed their means of > evaluation, and want to enforce that view on others. > > Why they can't just let people hear what they want to hear they way they > want to hear it and discuss it like sensible adults?
So the regen might work and you're open minded about it, just your understanding of digital electronics might need tweeking. Pity you won't engage in conversation with JS, I feel your current company is holding you back. Touch optimisations http://touchsgotrythm.blogspot.co.uk/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SBGK's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52003 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
