ralphpnj wrote: 
> No but a $175 device used to "solve" a "problem" with a $5,000 USB DAC
> is all part of the same ecosystem, an ecosystem where the price to
> performance ratio has no meaning. Want to isolate a $5000 DAC from the
> evils of USB? By a SB Touch, stream it digital audio via wi-fi and
> connect it to the DAC via a coax digital cable. One problem solved but
> another more important problem is introduced, namely the problem of how
> to sell another "solution" when there are no "problems" to be found. As
> I said earlier, *weren't all those asynchronous USB DACs supposed to
> "fix" all the nasty problems with USB?* The very definition of a circle
> jerk.
No, you also seem to have great difficulty in understanding the
technology & what it's addressing - Asynchronous USB was simply
addressing the timing issues inherent in using the PC clock. Your
simplistic statement/viewpoint "Supposed to fix all the nasty USB
problems" is of your own making born from a shortfall in technical
understanding.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to