jkeny wrote: > <snip childish insults on the grounds that being a placebophile, the > author can't help himself> > > "This packet noise consists of two parts: noise from the USB protocol > engine and from the USB PHY." > > <snip additional childish insults on the grounds that remaining a > placebophile, the author still can't help himself> > >
Let's see if saying the truth a new way will help. What reasonable person believes that statement in its entirety without any reliable confirming evidence? At this time the vendor doesn't seem to even have as good evidence as Archmiago and I do. Seems like the Regen vendor is just like you jkeny, and it is like the dog ate his test equipment. Given that he seems to be a placebophlie, maybe he never had any test gear and getting any is against his placebophile religion to beg, borrow, steal, or actually rent or buy any? The only reliable evidence I've seen says that the noise is there but there is no reliable indication of where it comes from. Got any reliable evidence that breaks it down by source? Let's say it is true that the noise comes from both sources claimed and that 99.9% of the noise comes from the Protocol Engine and 0.1% comes from the PHY and in total, it is so small to be inaudible. What audible benefit does the listener obtain if we further reduce the noise from the PHY, which is the only thing that the it appears that the Regen can do? Finally, where is the reliable evidence that the Regen actually does anything to reduce the nose, regardless of where it comes from? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
