jkeny wrote: 
> I wasn't specifically referring to you, ralphjn but you seem to take on
> the attributes & answered
> 
> I'm not even going to link to the many, many reports of an audible noise
> on the output of a non-asynchronous USB DAC - noticeable when mouse
> movements, HDD access, keyboard activity, etc. 
> 

As usual, a deflection. The question was for reliable reports of cases
where asych made an improvement. Furthermore most of those kinds of
problems happen on PCs with other discernable and correctible software
and hardware problems. Making them go away without hardware upgrades or
asynch DACs is a common topic of discussion which often leads to
success. 

> 
> If you want to deny this reality then it will not surprise me. These
> specific problems were solved & disappeared with the introduction of
> good asynchronous USB communications.
> 

Still no examples, just an unsupported assertion.

> 
> And no asynch USB is not a panacea for everything as you seem to want
> to portray with the intent of saying that now there is another USB
> solved by the Regen. The Regen deals with a very specific & different
> problem.
> 

The Regen home page and some blog entries paint a picture that can be
reasonably translated into "panacea". I think there is actually one Blog
article that admits that there are some problems it can't help, but even
then it quibbles.

> 
> 
> If any of you care to look (but beware, it takes a bit of understanding)
> there is an empirical analysis of this issue by Jim LeSurf (a lecturer
> in Physics & electronics) of the beloved Benchmark DACMagic Vs a
> DACMagic with a Halide Bridge in front of it. See if you agree with his
> conclusions & if not, why not. 
> http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Linux/Sound3/TimeForChange.html

I agree with his numerical results and then see that most of his charts
are labelled in parts per Billion, not dB. Quick conversion chart
Thousand: = -60 dB, Million: = -120 dB  Billion = -180 db.  

I know this guy from way back and he is very careful about his claims
for audibility. He seems to make none in this article.

Yet another case like yesterday (the upsampled ABX)  where jkeny brings
in evidence that actually hurts his general position because he does not
understand the data. 

Methinks understanding measurements would be a big help to him. That
would be a life change, no? ;-)


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to