SBGK wrote: > a wifi attached touch is not something that should be feeding a $5000 > dac, unless listening to streaming radio or something.
ralphpnj wrote: > And why not? Because some clown writing in some slick magazine said so? > Tell me is your favorite food crackers because you sure sound like a > parrot. > ...... > But now I have a question for all you true audiophiles out there: since > no squeezebox device, modified or stock, can play any kind of DSD file > why are you still here? Please the sooner you leave the better. SBGK wrote: > you're either on meds or should be on meds, don't know which. Your > diatribes are starting to sound insane. As you can see from the quotes above it was you stated that the Touch was not a worthy source for a $5,000 DAC and I asked why not, something you still have not answered. Now when I answer my own question you claim that I'm going insane. One thing I do know it is getting harder and harder to parody audiophiles since so many them are parodies without my or anyone else's help. Incredible. Living Rm: Transporter-SimAudio pre/power amps-Vandersteen 3A Sign. & sub Home Theater: Touch-Marantz HTR-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Linn sub Computer Rm: Touch-Headroom Desktop w/DAC-Aragon amp-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Energy sub Bedroom: Touch-HR Desktop w/DAC-Audio Refinement amp-Energy Veritas 2.0 Guest Rm: Duet-Sony soundbar Garage: SB3-JVC compact system Controls: iPeng; SB Controller; Moose & Muso Server: SBS on dedicated windows 7 computer w/2 Drobos 'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
