arnyk wrote: 
> No jkeny, no reading problems here. I just know what the numbers mean.
> You obviously don't.
> 
> Here's your quote:
> 
> "Here the rate jumps down about 8 ppm for around 2 seconds at a time.
> Now an 8 ppm change in rate accumulates to a timing error of 16
> microseconds over two seconds. i.e. a ‘jitter’ over this period of 16
> million picoseconds! This is many orders of magnitude greater than the
> kinds of values reported for J-Test measurements on shorter timescales!"
> 
> An error accumulated over a period of seconds is a timing error, not
> audible jitter.   
> 
> About the lowest jitter that anybody talks about has a period of 1/3 of
> a Hz, as in a LP spinning on a turntable that is a little off center.
> That's endemic in LP playback and it is tolerated by the ear unless it
> is really bad.
> 
> A timing error of 16 microseconds over two seconds is equivalent to a
> frequency error of  8 microseconds per second, or 0.0008%. Humans can
> actually hear timing errors of several  thousand times that, but not
> much less, if you catch my drift.  
> 
> For reference most of the better A/V gear has timing accuracy on the
> order order of 0.005% more or less, and it isn't audible either. 
> 
> You have not shown that JL claims any audible effects. Like I said I
> have known the man for years and with data like this, he likely he never
> will.  He's just having fun throwing numbers around.
> 
> You are deflecting again, jkeny and part of your problem is that you are
> trying to win this argument with numbers, but you don't know what the
> numbers mean because you loathe measurements with such a profound
> hatred.
> 
> Numbers are my friends! 
> 
> If nothing else jkeny the have already provided me with many
> opportunities to show know-nothings up, like this one.

Again, your desire to be always right shows up your foolishness
The commonly accepted smallest inter-channel timing that humans can hear
is somewhere from 4 microseconds to 10 microseconds, depending on which
research you read. Your statement "equivalent to a frequency error of 8
microseconds per second, or 0.0008%.
_*Humans_can_actually_hear_timing_errors_of_several_thousand_times_that,_but_not_much_less*_,
if you catch my drift." is complete hogwash - several thousand times 8
microseconds but not much less. Please!!


------------------------------------------------------------------------
jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to