marcoc1712 wrote: > I was the first asking not to open this can of worm , again...
Yes and no. Had you simply stated "I know there is no audible difference, but I have other reasons", it probably would not have caused any reactions. But instead you argued for the audibility of the differences, just like below: > Aftre reding the Archimago article, it's clear (and is not nothing) that > differences are little but are in place, "-90db means are inaudible" is > wrong, it depends on many factors. But here I think other than IT guys > should join the discussion. No, -90dB means "probably at the limit of the measuring system". > Measure by two different systems shows me that CPU usage is increasing > using flac vs WAV, network traffic is - of course - decreasing by a > greater factor (see the original THD for details), but sure, those > measure are too naif. > > I'm still missing the one that prouf the opposite and - in any case- I > think they are not 'the answer' to the question. We have asked you for details about your measurements. Meanwhile several people have pointed out measurements that show less load when using flac. "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104227 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
