adamdea wrote: > This reminds me of the alleged flaw in Meyer and Moran that some of the > "favourite sacds" were actually upsampled red book. Ok so hirez may > actually be distinguishable from 16/44 because some of the files which > were thought to be hirez, but were actually indistinguishable from 16/44 > were actually 16/44 but no one noticed at the time. And why weren;t they > noticed to be upsampled 16/44?
Yes, that was a good one. "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105413 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
