adamdea wrote: > This reminds me of the alleged flaw in Meyer and Moran that some of the > "favourite sacds" were actually upsampled red book. >
It is true that this was a flaw in the experiment. They should have played the SACDs and DVD-A to ensure that they actually had hi rez content . Reporting this flaw would have enhanced the results and conclusions part of their article. Interestingly enough I know of no reports from high end reviewers of this effect. > > Ok so hirez may actually be distinguishable from 16/44 because some of > the files which were thought to be hirez, but were actually > indistinguishable from 16/44 were actually 16/44 but no one noticed at > the time. And why weren;t they noticed to be upsampled 16/44? The problem of the absence of appreciable ultrasonic content in so-called ho rez recordings was AFAIK first reported in this article: http://www.davidgriesinger.com/intermod.ppt This paper was first given at the AES 24th AES International Conference on Multichannel Audio: June 26-28, 2003 Banff, Canada. It seems to predate the well known Meyer and Moran study by about 4 years. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105413 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
