arnyk wrote: > As usual wew have a post that makes false claim and then assumes that > everybody agrees with it. > > You've invented a highly narrow criteria which is impossible, namely: > "You can't prove that holds true for all people at all times and under > all circumstances." , and then faulted ABX testing because it can't do > that impossible thing. > > There is no test that holds true for all people at all times and under > all circumstances. If it exists, name it! > > That sort of false logic may fool young children, but this is generally > a forum that is populated by teenagers and adults.
Isn't that what "prove" means? Beyond any doubt? And if there is no test that proves that for all people for all circumstances there is no real audible difference between two components then where did I go wrong? I didn't say your statement was wrong, just pointing out your caveat that proving things for "reasonable people" (though I take exception to your use of the word reasonable implying that those who don't agree with you aren't being reasonable... ;) ) implies that it's a statistical probability not absolute truth. Is that a fair reading of your comment? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105572 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
