drmatt wrote: 
> 
> 
> > arny as Dr. Matt cut it to ribbons wrote: 
> > 
> > Fat sausage mastering is so popular because there is a perception that
> > it helps sell recordings.
> > > > 
> 
> > arny as he wrote it wrote: 
> > 
> > Fat sausage mastering is so popular because there is a perception that
> > it helps sell recordings. When recordings are played near the ambient
> > noise level (e.g. portable player in high noise environment or as
> > background music in an office) it makes the recording more clearly
> > audible. Of course it sucks the life out of recordings when played at
> > the levels many use when doing dedicated music listening, but that mode
> > of usage is not the rule.
> > > > 
> 
> > > > 
> > I am well aware of all this. 
> > > > 
> 
> Really? If so then why do you butcher my statement as shown above? 
> Why limit the effects of compression to just radio, when in fact it
> can affect any form of reproduction?
> 
> > > > 
> > Most commonly it is seen in conjunction with heavy compression and
> > squashed dynamic range (and sometimes outright distortion), which could
> > be an artistic choice but most often is more to do with making it sound
> > loud on the radio,
> > > > 
> 
> Radios often have nothing to do with the desire for compression.
> 
> > > > 
> > and to hell with the sound quality for those that take the time to
> > listen properly. Very frustrating.
> > > > 
> 
> Compression improves perceived sound quality in certain common
> environments, most of which have nothing to do with radio. Furthermore
> there are radio stations that don't use compression.
> 
> > > > 
> > Well that's right, it doesn't go anywhere near far enough. Which is why
> > I suggested it's part of a first step only...
> > > > 
> 
> How is something that has no audible benefits good as part of a first
> step?
> 
> As others have pointed out, MQA's developers based MQA on an alleged
> sonic problem that was in fact a fabrication of their minds, something
> that is actually not an audible problem during sound reproduction.  I
> guarantee I can fix your stereo if what I purport to fix is something
> that I just  dreamed up and deceived you into thinking it exists. By
> demonstrating my alleged invention only with sighted evaluations I can
> trick suggestible people (with sighted evaluations that's just about
> everybody who plays their game) into confirming the efficacy of  my
> alleged invention.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105070

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to