drmatt wrote: > Yes it sounds like MQA is already dying on its feet. No matter, perhaps > the inertia or desire for a standard can be used to produce a better > one... > > In the old days we'd have got the BBC to do it.. but that's been > neutered and can't produce its own obituary.
I dunno. It sounds like you are saying: "there's a desire to sort things out, and create useful standards, and that's good. The result was MQA, which isn't good, but still, the intention was good". Is that what you're saying? I fear that the intention was nothing of the sort. I believe the intention was nothing more than an attempt to hood-wink people into spending money on something they don't need, to solve a problem that doesn't exist, using a mixture of pseudo-science, unscientific tests, and corrupt mass-media. I don't believe there was any good intention behind it. I would be happy if you were right, though. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ cdmackay's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=24816 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105070 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
