Yes. Lots of text :-). Let's just lay it on the table and get it done with. The use of the impulse response to justify FUD is one of the greatest 'controversies' out there.
As if we can actually hear the ringing for one. As if going through a sharp filter would actually excite tons of ringing in actual music. And as if we should go ooohhhh and aaaahhhh over yet another $$$$ DAC because the designer programmed some mystical algorithm in his fancy FPGA! Thanks for the tip on the Clapton. So I guess one could pay 30 bucks to buy a 24/192 file with watermarking versus 10 bucks for a CD which at best can be differentiated <53% of the time by researchers using presumably great gear in a good room, with no watermarking to potentially mar the sound... Hmm mmmmm... This is just getting worse. Archimago's Musings: (archimago.blogspot.com) A 'more objective' audiophile blog. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Archimago's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2207 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105816 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
