Archimago wrote: > Yes. Lots of text :-). > > Let's just lay it on the table and get it done with. The use of the > impulse response to justify FUD is one of the greatest 'controversies' > out there. > > As if we can actually hear the ringing for one. > > As if going through a sharp filter would actually excite tons of ringing > in actual music. > > And as if we should go ooohhhh and aaaahhhh over yet another $$$$ DAC > because the designer programmed some mystical algorithm in his fancy > FPGA! > > Thanks for the tip on the Clapton. So I guess one could pay 30 bucks to > buy a 24/192 file with watermarking versus 10 bucks for a CD which at > best can be differentiated <53% of the time by researchers using > presumably great gear in a good room, with no watermarking to > potentially mar the sound... Hmm mmmmm... > > This is just getting worse.
And who exclude those who state they can't hear a difference from the study... ...pablo Server: Virtual Machine (on VMware Workstation 12) running Ubuntu 16.04 + LMS 7.9 System: SB Touch --optical->- Benchmark DAC2HGC --AnalysisPlus Oval Copper XLR->- NAD M22 Power Amp --AnalysisPlus Black Mesh Oval->- Totem Element Fire Other Rooms: 2x SB Boom; 1x SB Radio; 1x SB Classic-> NAD D7050 -> Totem DreamCatcher + Velodyne Minivee Sub Computer audio: workstation --USB->- audioengine D1 -> Grado PS500e/Shure 1540 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ pablolie's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3816 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105816 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
