drmatt wrote: > But like all hypotheses, you only need to find -one- person who can > consistently tell the difference and you have disproved the theory that > "no-one can tell the difference"..
I guess that depends on your number of trials. If one person can tell it all the time (not the case here) in all of 10 trials, but 1023 other people couldn't, it is precisely what you would expect based on statistics. > debate will live forever. Indeed - just because it is hard to prove a negative, and many people don't believer a proof anyway. "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105816 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
