EL7's using 2.0.0 though - so if you want to drop Ruby 1.x then I don't think that's a problem. The latest Ubuntu LTS also moves to Ruby 2.x by default.
I tend towards keeping them until there's a reason to drop them, but wouldn't mind much if they were removed now. -- Dominic Cleal [email protected] On 28/04/16 23:23, David Lutterkort wrote: > Ok .. it sounds that we should still test against 1.9.3 then ... > > David > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Pat Riehecky <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I would prefer to run against what EL7 ships. I make somewhat heavy > use of augeas internally, though through augtool and puppet. > > Pat > > -- > Pat Riehecky > Scientific Linux developer > > Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory > www.fnal.gov <http://www.fnal.gov> > www.scientificlinux.org <http://www.scientificlinux.org> > > > > On 04/27/2016 01:53 PM, David Lutterkort wrote: >> In putting up https://github.com/hercules-team/ruby-augeas/pull/6 >> I realized that we run Travis against Ruby 1.9.7 and 1.9.3, both >> of which are EOL. >> >> I'd like to hear from people what they think a reasonable minimum >> Ruby version would be: 2.0.0 which is what CentOS 7 uses ? >> Something newer than that ? >> >> David >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> augeas-devel mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/augeas-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > augeas-devel mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/augeas-devel > > > > > _______________________________________________ > augeas-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/augeas-devel > _______________________________________________ augeas-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/augeas-devel
