Is there any worry about RHEL6 compat? Latest version there is 1.8.7.
I'm more or less comfortable with the augeas that is in RHEL6 today, but
I can't speak for others.
Pat
On 05/04/2016 02:16 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
The question was prompted by PR 6
<https://github.com/hercules-team/ruby-augeas/pull/6> where I tried to
cargo cult building ruby-augeas on OSX from the dotdoom fork - Travis
fails on that change.
For building on OSX, I am inclined to not merge PR 6 and instead
document that you need to use homebrew and then 'brew install augeas
pkg-config' to build ruby-augeas; at least that worked for me. I'd
love to hear if that approach is bad in some way.
For Ruby compat, I think we should stop building against 1.8.7, but
still build against 1.9.3 and add 2.0.0
How does that sound ?
David
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:03 AM, Dominic Cleal <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
EL7's using 2.0.0 though - so if you want to drop Ruby 1.x then I
don't
think that's a problem. The latest Ubuntu LTS also moves to Ruby
2.x by
default.
I tend towards keeping them until there's a reason to drop them, but
wouldn't mind much if they were removed now.
--
Dominic Cleal
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
On 28/04/16 23:23, David Lutterkort wrote:
> Ok .. it sounds that we should still test against 1.9.3 then ...
>
> David
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Pat Riehecky
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>
> I would prefer to run against what EL7 ships. I make
somewhat heavy
> use of augeas internally, though through augtool and puppet.
>
> Pat
>
> --
> Pat Riehecky
> Scientific Linux developer
>
> Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
> www.fnal.gov <http://www.fnal.gov> <http://www.fnal.gov>
> www.scientificlinux.org <http://www.scientificlinux.org>
<http://www.scientificlinux.org>
>
>
>
> On 04/27/2016 01:53 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
>> In putting up
https://github.com/hercules-team/ruby-augeas/pull/6
>> I realized that we run Travis against Ruby 1.9.7 and 1.9.3,
both
>> of which are EOL.
>>
>> I'd like to hear from people what they think a reasonable
minimum
>> Ruby version would be: 2.0.0 which is what CentOS 7 uses ?
>> Something newer than that ?
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> augeas-devel mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/augeas-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> augeas-devel mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/augeas-devel
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> augeas-devel mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/augeas-devel
>
_______________________________________________
augeas-devel mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/augeas-devel
_______________________________________________
augeas-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/augeas-devel
_______________________________________________
augeas-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/augeas-devel
