On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Antonio Lucas <[email protected]> wrote: > hi, > > wwt-svn[1] and wit-svn[2] are the same package. Both maintainers are active, > and both packages get the latest version from svn of this package (even the > packages containing a version on them). > what do you guys do in this situations? > > > <http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37504>[1] > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34239 > [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37504 > > abracos > Antonio Lucas
I'm not sure which package should go; wit-svn has a more correct name, but wwt-svn was uploaded first and has more votes. I'm CC'ing the respective maintainers so they can decide which package we should keep. :]
