On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Alexander Duscheleit <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 19:31:07 +0200 > Xyne <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 2010-09-09 18:49 +0300 (36:4) >> Evangelos Foutras wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Antonio Lucas >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > hi, >> > > >> > > wwt-svn[1] and wit-svn[2] are the same package. Both maintainers >> > > are active, and both packages get the latest version from svn of >> > > this package (even the packages containing a version on them). >> > > what do you guys do in this situations? >> > > >> > > >> > > <http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37504>[1] >> > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34239 >> > > [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37504 >> > > >> > > abracos >> > > Antonio Lucas >> > >> > I'm not sure which package should go; wit-svn has a more correct >> > name, but wwt-svn was uploaded first and has more votes. >> > >> > I'm CC'ing the respective maintainers so they can decide which >> > package we should keep. :] >> >> The correct name should always take precedence in my opinion, >> regardless of the number of votes or upload date. It provides a more >> consistent system. >> >> In this case I would recommend that the original uploader be allowed >> to adopt the correctly named package. > > I'm the maintainer of the wwt-svn package, the original name of the > program was "Wiimms WBFS Tools", later renamed to "Wiimms ISO Tools". I > didn't catch the rename fast enough and so Gordin created the wit-svn > package. > > On one hand I don't care either way which package remains, on the other > hand I'll maintain my PKGBUILD anyway, since I neet those tools in > a semi-professional way. (I "maintain" a Wii in a public place and the > WBFS stuff gives us the possibility to restrict access to the Wii > itself and the original media.) > The build-system is homegrown and needs quite a bit of handholding to > get a proper package. > From a glance at the two PKGBUILDs it seems, mine is a bit more up to > current standards, while Gordin's seems to "do" more, though I'm not > clear to what purpose.
Thanks for jumping in. I've disowned wit-svn. Please adopt it and upload your package under the new name. When you're done, reply here and I'll delete wwt-svn.
