On 2010-09-09 18:49 +0300 (36:4) Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Antonio Lucas <[email protected]> wrote: > > hi, > > > > wwt-svn[1] and wit-svn[2] are the same package. Both maintainers are active, > > and both packages get the latest version from svn of this package (even the > > packages containing a version on them). > > what do you guys do in this situations? > > > > > > <http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37504>[1] > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34239 > > [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37504 > > > > abracos > > Antonio Lucas > > I'm not sure which package should go; wit-svn has a more correct name, > but wwt-svn was uploaded first and has more votes. > > I'm CC'ing the respective maintainers so they can decide which package > we should keep. :]
The correct name should always take precedence in my opinion, regardless of the number of votes or upload date. It provides a more consistent system. In this case I would recommend that the original uploader be allowed to adopt the correctly named package.
