On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:48:10 -0500 Thomas Dziedzic <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Adam Hani Schakaki <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:28:16 -0500 > > Thomas Dziedzic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Adam Hani Schakaki <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > please orphan go-openoffice-el [1] and go-openoffice-es [2] since those > >> > are outdated for a long time but don't get updated. > >> > > >> > Thanks in advance > >> > > >> > Adam Hani Schakaki > >> > > >> > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27124 > >> > [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26321 > >> > > >> > >> Did you try contacting the maintainers? > > > > Shouldn't they get an information if someone flags their package out of > > date? If not, I will try to contact them. > > I don't think that they didn't manage to update it since only the version > > number needs to be changed. > > > > Adam Hani Schakaki > > > > Usually I only orphan a package if the maintainer has been contacted > by someone and they still haven't updated it. > There could be many reasons as to why they didn't update (like > forgetting), which is why I prefer friendly reminders first :) Go-openoffice-el was already orphaned by Andrea Scarpino. I wrote an email on Sep 25, but got no answer until now. So I think go-openoffice-es can be orphaned, or not? Adam Hani Schakaki
