On 10/05/2010 01:19 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Am 05.10.2010 17:40, schrieb Adam Hani Schakaki:
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:48:10 -0500
Thomas Dziedzic<[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Adam Hani Schakaki<[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:28:16 -0500
Thomas Dziedzic<[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Adam Hani Schakaki<[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
please orphan go-openoffice-el [1] and go-openoffice-es [2] since those are
outdated for a long time but don't get updated.
Thanks in advance
Adam Hani Schakaki
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27124
[2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26321
Did you try contacting the maintainers?
Shouldn't they get an information if someone flags their package out of date?
If not, I will try to contact them.
I don't think that they didn't manage to update it since only the version
number needs to be changed.
Adam Hani Schakaki
Usually I only orphan a package if the maintainer has been contacted
by someone and they still haven't updated it.
There could be many reasons as to why they didn't update (like
forgetting), which is why I prefer friendly reminders first :)
Go-openoffice-el was already orphaned by Andrea Scarpino. I wrote an email on
Sep 25, but got no answer until now. So I think go-openoffice-es can be
orphaned, or not?
Adam Hani Schakaki
Let's give him another week or so.
Regards Stefan
I already did a comment on that package of how must be updated
(jvalecillos user). The mantainer did never reply me. If you get adopt
the packages, please consider that recommendations that i wrote.
