Am 05.10.2010 17:40, schrieb Adam Hani Schakaki: > On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:48:10 -0500 > Thomas Dziedzic <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Adam Hani Schakaki <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:28:16 -0500 >>> Thomas Dziedzic <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Adam Hani Schakaki <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> please orphan go-openoffice-el [1] and go-openoffice-es [2] since those >>>>> are outdated for a long time but don't get updated. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance >>>>> >>>>> Adam Hani Schakaki >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27124 >>>>> [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26321 >>>>> >>>> >>>> Did you try contacting the maintainers? >>> >>> Shouldn't they get an information if someone flags their package out of >>> date? If not, I will try to contact them. >>> I don't think that they didn't manage to update it since only the version >>> number needs to be changed. >>> >>> Adam Hani Schakaki >>> >> >> Usually I only orphan a package if the maintainer has been contacted >> by someone and they still haven't updated it. >> There could be many reasons as to why they didn't update (like >> forgetting), which is why I prefer friendly reminders first :) > > Go-openoffice-el was already orphaned by Andrea Scarpino. I wrote an email on > Sep 25, but got no answer until now. So I think go-openoffice-es can be > orphaned, or not? > > Adam Hani Schakaki >
Let's give him another week or so. Regards Stefan
