Le samedi 4 décembre 2010 23:58:33, Ionuț Bîru a écrit : > hi, > because of my lack of understanding of bylaws and failing to comply with > them on my first proposal, i like to take the chance and redo the > proposal, following letter by letter the removing procedure. > > Conform bylaws a motion procedure should be sent on aur-general with > reasons. > > Here are my reasons: > > 1) i noticed in January he doesn't have an account on our devel panel, i > asked him to send all the infos to get one and he replied that he > doesn't need one because none of his packages are suitable for > community. Replying to his email i encourage to get one and adopt some > packages from community. At that time we have ~700 orphans and i haven't > got any replies from him. > > 2) no commits in community since the addition. > > 3) he's not marked as inactive and conform bylaws this deviates from the > "above", above being, 5 days discussion period + 7 voting. Because of > that i'm starting a 3 days discussion period and 5 days voting. > > Please discuss the motion(really discuss and not like in > previous,couples of hours and the next days arguing about bylaws) > > Ranguvar can defend himself.
I'm the second TU for the removal procedure for Ranguvar Laurent Carlier
