On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Christopher Brannon <[email protected]> wrote: > Ionuț Bîru <[email protected]> writes: > >> 2) no commits in community since the addition. >> >> 3) he's not marked as inactive and conform bylaws this deviates from >> the "above", above being, 5 days discussion period + 7 voting. Because >> of that i'm starting a 3 days discussion period and 5 days voting. > > If he had ever been active, I would probably vote against the proposal. > I hate to see this sort of thing. Unfortunately, Ranguvar has been AWOL > since he was elected. Removal seems appropriate. > > Ranguvar, you have my best wishes. > > -- Chris >
I also vote for removal. "Gentlemen, we can rebuild him. We have the technology."
