2010/12/4 Laurent Carlier <[email protected]>: > Le samedi 4 décembre 2010 23:58:33, Ionuț Bîru a écrit : >> hi, >> because of my lack of understanding of bylaws and failing to comply with >> them on my first proposal, i like to take the chance and redo the >> proposal, following letter by letter the removing procedure. >> >> Conform bylaws a motion procedure should be sent on aur-general with >> reasons. >> >> Here are my reasons: >> >> 1) i noticed in January he doesn't have an account on our devel panel, i >> asked him to send all the infos to get one and he replied that he >> doesn't need one because none of his packages are suitable for >> community. Replying to his email i encourage to get one and adopt some >> packages from community. At that time we have ~700 orphans and i haven't >> got any replies from him. >> >> 2) no commits in community since the addition. >> >> 3) he's not marked as inactive and conform bylaws this deviates from the >> "above", above being, 5 days discussion period + 7 voting. Because of >> that i'm starting a 3 days discussion period and 5 days voting. >> >> Please discuss the motion(really discuss and not like in >> previous,couples of hours and the next days arguing about bylaws) >> >> Ranguvar can defend himself. > > I'm the second TU for the removal procedure for Ranguvar > > Laurent Carlier >
I should be the first one, but let's be the third this time. -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Developer / Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com
