On Sun 05 Dec 2010 16:19 -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote: > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Loui Chang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This proposal clarifies the Standard Voting Procedure, and allows > > another condition for passing a motion. > > > > <address> > > Trusted Users > > @@ -79,9 +79,12 @@ > > <br><br> > > > > At the expiration of the voting period, if a quorum > > was reached, votes are to be tallied. > > - A simple majority is needed to pass or reject the > > motion. In the event of a draw, being > > - that 50% is not a majority, the motion does not > > pass. In the event that a quorum was not > > - reached, a duplicate voting period opens > > immediately after the first ends, all previous votes are > > + The motion is passed if quorum is reached and the > > number of YES votes is greater than the number of NO votes. > > + The motion is also passed if quorum is not reached > > but the number of YES votes exceeds fifty percent of the number of active > > Trusted Users. > > + The motion is rejected if quorum is reached and the > > number of NO votes is greater or equal to the number of YES votes. > > + > > + In the event that a quorum was not reached and the > > motion is not passed, > > + a duplicate voting period opens immediately after > > the first ends, all previous votes are > > struck from the record, and the voting period is > > repeated. If quorum cannot be reached > > for two consecutive voting periods, the motion fails > > to pass.<br><br> > > > > Looks good to me, except "greater or equal to" is usually written as > "greater than or equal to". --Kaiting.
Ah right good catch. Let's see what others think now before revising.
