On Mon 06 Dec 2010 23:08 -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote: > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Thorsten Töpper > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > So far it is mostly fine for me, however from this paragraph it is not > > clear if the vote is still open when the quorum was reached and the > > application passed. In my opinion it should be, so everyone has the > > chance to do a vote and express his way though it doesn't matter. > > (Yes it does not make any formal sense, however I think about human > > emotions that it's better to do so, so no one feels to be excluded > > just as the vote is another in a row where he/she could not > > participate. In other words: Kaiting that was what I meant yesterday.) > > I'm not really one for human emotion, but I'll go ahead and conceded to a > full voting period regardless of whether or not a vote is set. > > I've read through this a couple more times and I'm little concerned about > the particular wording. Unfortunately I don't know how to make this any > clearer so I guess I'll shut up...
Honestly, I wouldn't mind hearing your concerns. I realise that I could improve my writing skills at least. Do we have any technical writers in the community? :D
