On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Thorsten Töpper <[email protected]>wrote:
> So far it is mostly fine for me, however from this paragraph it is not > clear if the vote is still open when the quorum was reached and the > application passed. In my opinion it should be, so everyone has the > chance to do a vote and express his way though it doesn't matter. > (Yes it does not make any formal sense, however I think about human > emotions that it's better to do so, so no one feels to be excluded > just as the vote is another in a row where he/she could not > participate. In other words: Kaiting that was what I meant yesterday.) > I'm not really one for human emotion, but I'll go ahead and conceded to a full voting period regardless of whether or not a vote is set. I've read through this a couple more times and I'm little concerned about the particular wording. Unfortunately I don't know how to make this any clearer so I guess I'll shut up... -- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
