On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 18:14:01 +0100 Xyne <[email protected]> wrote: > PyroPeter wrote: > > > On 12/07/2010 05:36 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > > > On 12/07/2010 06:19 PM, Daenyth Blank wrote: > > >> Wow he actually launched that bot? I thought it was a joke. It > > >> seemed so stupid that I didn't think anyone would take it > > >> seriously. That definitely opens up some other perspectives on > > >> the application... > > > > > > dude, he said it will write a bot for aur. RIGHT NOW he has a bot > > > for bugtracker and it doesn't send any emails, just write some > > > text in the channel. nothing more, nothing less > > > > I think he actually launched the AUR-bot: > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8388 > > (first comment) > > > Some AUR users have posted on the list in response to the bot. I > can't find the others right now but here's one: > > http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2010-December/012330.html > > Just to be clear, the bot does not insult anyone and it does state > the reason for the comment rather than some ambiguous "ur pkg is full > of fail, lol" comment. > > My issue is that I consider the launch premature and overzealous and > I'm seeking reassurance that in the future ongoing discussions will > be considered before action is taken.
Still because of that quickshot I'll change my previous expectation to vote. Even a reassurance won't change that for this vote, probably for a future one but not for this. Sorry but once a application is passed the applicant has directly to show a responsible behaviour, TU stands for Trusted User not Trolling User. This is not meant as a direct insult, don't misinterprete it. Atsutane -- Jabber: [email protected] Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
