On 8 December 2010 02:56, Xyne <[email protected]> wrote: > Thorsten Töpper wrote: > >> > Some AUR users have posted on the list in response to the bot. I >> > can't find the others right now but here's one: >> > >> > http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2010-December/012330.html >> > >> > Just to be clear, the bot does not insult anyone and it does state >> > the reason for the comment rather than some ambiguous "ur pkg is full >> > of fail, lol" comment. >> > >> > My issue is that I consider the launch premature and overzealous and >> > I'm seeking reassurance that in the future ongoing discussions will >> > be considered before action is taken. >> >> Still because of that quickshot I'll change my previous expectation to >> vote. >> >> Even a reassurance won't change that for this vote, probably for a >> future one but not for this. >> >> Sorry but once a application is passed the applicant has directly to >> show a responsible behaviour, TU stands for Trusted User not Trolling >> User. >> This is not meant as a direct insult, don't misinterprete it. > > Regardless of how it was meant, "Trolling User" was inappropriate imo. The > intentions were good. It's the rashness that's the problem as far as I'm > concerned. Realizing that it was a bad idea and that there are better ways to > do things is enough.
I don't see this as a real problem to this application. He is competent enough and aside from the recent undertakings his attitude is totally fine, and I'm sure his bots will be a good tool internally. Making rash decisions can be solved by advice and warnings.
