On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 05:57:34 +0800 Ray Rashif <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8 December 2010 05:44, keenerd <[email protected]> wrote: > > After much heavy thought, I withdraw my application. My apologies > > for the trouble. > > You shouldn't let other issues hinder your application. Reconsider > withdrawing, because it would disappoint your sponsor. You were asked > a very simple question: > > "Considering this and the still-ongoing discussion about the AUR > guidelines, do you agree that it would be prudent to be more patient > in the future and wait until we've come to a conclusion before going > ahead with something like this again?" > > And that's about it. Maybe some took the bot issue a little too > seriously, but we would still vote. Personally, I believe you will be > of help to the team :)
Don't withdraw, you made a good impression and as long as you answer this question of Xyne I don't think there are people that vote against you as long as you assure to keep waiting till something is decided in the future. An Abstain is not a No, it is to reach quorum and I'm still mostly tending to that, as Lukas said you made a very good impression and I think if we two had real contact in the past, I still would vote clearly for you. I think this application will pass, I guess there are enough of us who really know you and vote for a Yes as they really know your person and don't just read some forum posts as I did. So don't withdraw, just make a clear assurance to keep low till something is really discussed and you'll pass, as long as there are more Yes votes than No votes and like I said there won't be many of the latter as you really left a good impression. An Abstain is to reach Quorum it currently has no influence on wether a vote passes or not. -- Jabber: [email protected] Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
