Hello. Le Sun, 14 Jun 2015 15:51:02 +0200, Johannes Löthberg <[email protected]> a écrit :
> > In which way is it cleaner and more structured? It's a bash hack > instead of actually using properly structured and supported features. > Please take this not-a-bug https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/43714 in consideration, too. It's why i'm not using this structure, personnally: if I did, i'd have to use unique names for each architecture dependant source, and change my package function and/or my build function to take thoses unique names into account. A bash hack inside a bash script is not this bad. -- Rémy Grünblatt Site Monod Tél. : 06.51.74.06.13
pgpuxE_ng209h.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
