On 14/06, Reventlov wrote:
In which way is it cleaner and more structured? It's a bash hack
instead of actually using properly structured and supported features.


Please take this not-a-bug https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/43714 in
consideration, too.

It's why i'm not using this structure, personnally: if I did, i'd have
to use unique names for each architecture dependant source, and change
my package function and/or my build function to take thoses unique
names into account.

A bash hack inside a bash script is not this bad.


I don't see how that is relevant anymore since the AUR doesn't use sourceballs anymore.

--
Sincerely,
 Johannes Löthberg
 PGP Key ID: 0x50FB9B273A9D0BB5
 https://theos.kyriasis.com/~kyrias/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to