On 14/06, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 14/06, Reventlov wrote:
In which way is it cleaner and more structured? It's a bash hack
instead of actually using properly structured and supported features.


Please take this not-a-bug https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/43714 in
consideration, too.

It's why i'm not using this structure, personnally: if I did, i'd have
to use unique names for each architecture dependant source, and change
my package function and/or my build function to take thoses unique
names into account.

A bash hack inside a bash script is not this bad.


I don't see how that is relevant anymore since the AUR doesn't use sourceballs anymore.


And it will also make it not show up in the AUR properly since the sources won't be parsed properly.

--
Sincerely,
 Johannes Löthberg
 PGP Key ID: 0x50FB9B273A9D0BB5
 https://theos.kyriasis.com/~kyrias/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to