Unsubscribe me please Sent from my iPhone
> On 2 Dec 2015, at 10:34 AM, John Orton <[email protected]> wrote: > > More than one case of the test not revealing a failure. > > An Astir CS which had been in a trailing crash. The underside of the wing > about 1 metre from the root had an obvious impact over the spar region. The > frequency test did not show any significant change. However when the damaged > area was opened for repair it revealed significant damage to the spar cap and > web. > > Regards, > John Orton > > >> On 2 December 2015 at 08:48, Mark Newton <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 1 Dec 2015, at 9:42 PM, Justin Couch <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > There is also one case where it didn't (Bathurst's DG300 that delaminated >> > the spar caps from the wing didn't pick up a freq change, but the tap test >> > did). >> >> Interesting - I’ve spoken to Brits who had never heard of the tap test and >> were a bit bemused at Australia’s seeming obsession with it when they found >> out about it. >> >> Nice to know that it might be useful for something :-) >> >> - mark >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Aus-soaring mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring > > _______________________________________________ > Aus-soaring mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring
_______________________________________________ Aus-soaring mailing list [email protected] http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring
